Feb 26, 2019

OM WorkSpace update history

Last Update: 13th December 2024

Olympus WorkSpace Page and Download - Link

OM-System update page for Products & Software - link

General Q & A page - link


Frustration with OM-System firmware updates


This is an issue for every photographer with an Olympus or OM-System camera. Here are the different options I tried to update my EM10 II on12th May 2024:

- My iMac (MacOS Ventura). I gave Workspace full access and couldn't do a FW update.
- An OLD Macbook Pro (High Sierra). It connects to the camera but NOT the OMS servers.
- An older Windows PC. It connects to the camera but NOT to the OMS firmware servers.

My iMac with Workspace (V2.3.2) can't connect to the camera. My older Macbook Pro and Windows PC connected to the camera but couldn't connect to the OM-System server. I received a message that my network has a connection problem. The same happens when I change to a different network. I also tried the OM System mobile phone App to update my E-M10 II.

A friendly guy at the M43 forum (DPR) created this option to upgrade firmware. Link

TIP: The only problem I experienced while updating an EM10 was the downloaded filename had to be changed to the BIN file name on the left of the chart below. See the illustration below.


The safest option for Mac owners is to ask a dealer with a Windows PC to update your Olympus. I did this for my used EM10 II plus IV. It's also a great opportunity to get a feel for Fuji cameras...


OMDS Workspace V2.3.3

Launch date:- 31st August 2024

I updated both my M1 Macbook Pro and my 2017 Intel iMac.

Notes: (2nd Sept 2024)
- The new version is slower than the previous version (pitty as V2.3.2 performs well)
- My M1 Macbook Pro is OK, but my Intel iMac is much slower. See this Intel article.
- The "faster" button does not seem to make a difference on my Intel iMac - not good!
- I had no request during the update for more access to my PCs - this seems like a plus
- I tried to update an older Olympus camera, but Workspace wanted more access to my PC... 
- A better option is to ask your local dealer to update any used Olympus cameras.
- For a summary of WS updates. (Go to the help menu in WS, and click "function info.")
- V2.3.2 is perfectly good - only upgrade older Intel Mac PCs if necessary...

My Intel iMac slowed down after installing Workspace V2.3.3. I had a bad experience deleting a newer version to reinstall the previous version in the past. This time I followed the advice of a DPReview forum poster and deleted the updated version. I then recovered V2.3.2 with Apple's Time Machine. It worked well, meaning I have V2.3.3 on my M1 Macbook Pro and V2.3.2 on my iMac.

How does one improve the screen update speed between adjustments?

The image below shows how to improve your display updates with Workspace. It does not negatively affect the displayed image quality of Workspace. I use this feature on the Intel iMac.





OMDS Workspace V2.3.2


Launch date:- 1st April 2024

I updated my copy on the 25th. The good news is it seems quicker than the previous version. I will add more info in a few days...

Notes: (2nd May)
 - The new version is definitely quicker than the previous version.
 - I tried PCRAW with my EM1 III. Nothing changed, the same as my previous comments...
 - No new features, no complaints, and nothing exciting to discover or discuss...
 - The extreme PC access requirements are still a pain - cannot update my Olympus cameras???
 - I decided not to allow OM-System the level of PC access they want. Why should I..?
 - OLDER WORKSPACE VERSIONS UPDATED OLYMPUS CAMERAS WITHOUT THIS ACCESS?

I spent much time on Workspace and gave the Olympus engineering team top marks for developing this raw converter. Workspace works well as a supplier raw converter, especially for those wanting a good but basic solution. The Enhanced Raw Format is unique and great for learning about Olympus cameras. I will keep Workspace on my PC. I will also focus more on DxO PhotoLab 7.

See this article. I posted an example of editing one of the test samples with PhotoLab 6. Version 6 or 7 does not need the same level of access to my Mac as Workspace. PhotoLab scans the DxO server for upgrades or missing lens profiles during startup. Downloads or updates are quick & easy...


OMDS Workspace V2.3


Launch date:- 31st January 2024

OM-System updated Workspace for the new OM-1 II. I installed the new version on my Macbook Pro with an M1 processor. OM-System also updated the Instruction Manual to V2.3. You will find a link to the new instruction manual in the Help Menu of Workspace.

You will also find a link to the same "old" summary when updating to the new version.

Notes (12th March 2024):

   - There was a version 2.3.1 update a few days later. No info is available...
   - These 2 versions are slower than the previous version. No info as to why...
   - Other than an OM-1 II update, I haven't seen any new Workspace functions.
   - I regretly installed these new versions on both my Mackbook and iMac...
   - The access needed to PCs is accessive. I mentioned this in my V2.2 update.
   - I simply block OM-System in my Mac settings after installing the update.
   - That means I cannot update my camera via WS. I haven't tried the App yet.
   - OMS also requested my personal data when I bought my EM1 III and EP-7...
   - The only "benefit" I get from OMS having my data is an inbox with advertising...
   - The latest EU regulations highlighted the practice of selling customer data...

The previous Olympus Workspace versions never required this level of access. See this DPReview post. Whether this is an innocent discussion is irrelevant. Many Olympus photographers reading this post will never experience the benefits of the Enhanced Raw Format or Workspace. OM-System is making it hard to build trust and a long-term customer relationship...


OMDS Workspace V2.2.2


Launch date:- 31st September 2023

The V2.2.2 update is for a new server with camera update information. I updated my Laptop and iMac, and WS works well and is quick on both PCs. I question if OM-System has the in-house capacity to update the EM1 III or older Olympus cameras. I am OK with that because I will not update my Olympus cameras via OM-System. I am not planning to get any new OM-System products either...


OMDS Workspace V2.2.1


Launch date:- 29th September 2023

I was reminded of an update when I started Workspace. I updated my Macbook Pro M1, and all seems OK. I will wait before doing the update to my new iMac.



                                                                          Source: OMSystem.com


It looks like a tiny update. I will give more feedback in a week or two...


OMDS Workspace V2.2

Launch date:- 2nd July 2023 

Special update: 21st August 2023. I purchased a "like new" 2017 iMac 27". It has the i7 processor, Radeon Pro 850 8GB graphics, 500GB SSD, and 16GB RAM. The plan is to increase the RAM to 64GB. The purchase price was less than $900. I installed Ventura (macOS), the latest version of Photoshop, and Workspace V2.2 with the AI noise reduction option. The "new" iMac is quick, and the 5K display is excellent. Workspace and the AI noise reduction option work great. I am still concerned about Olympus cameras plus marketing research and will cover all this in my next article...

XXX

I upgraded my Macbook Pro (M1) first. The installation went quick, and everything seemed OK. See a summary of the V2.2 updates at this link. It's the same as V2.0. (Right-click and copy the link if it doesn't open.) The experience is different for my iMac. The PC-RAW "update" opens more questions. I saw some photographers demand unconditional loyalty to OM-System. How much loyalty should companies enjoy when our personal computers, data, and applications are open to marketers? 

Why a different PC-RAW experience for OM-1 and EM1 photographers? OM-System gives no technical reasons for "conventional" versus OM-1 photographers. Are they segregating their "conventional" loyal consumers? One group with "conventional" Pro cameras gets less functionality, and another with OM-System cameras enjoys FULL functionality? Is this a winning strategy for OM-System? 

See my OM-5 comments here.

Keep a watchful eye on the following trends. This applies to ALL editing applications:-

  • Newer programs like PS only open with a direct Web link to Adobe.
  • Another trend is AI wanting more processing power and expensive PCs
  • Editing applications should be free from market research on customer PCs

Please check the required PC specifications for V2.2...


Do NOT upgrade if you use an older PC.


                                                           Copied from the latest Workspace Manual

My comments as I discover V2.2:-


  • My Macbook M1 is slower with Version 2.2. It's now the same as my iMac with V2.11.
  • There are no improvements for conventional EM1 II/III/X cameras in PC-RAW mode.
  • I really like the AI Noise Reduction from WS. OM-System is becoming a leader in NR.
  • Being a leader among camera manufacturers means AI NR is tailored for our cameras.
  • The standard NR function in WS is excellent. I use the Low option most of the time.
  • I tested the AI NR option versus standard NR, and the results were the same at ISO800.
  • I updated my old iMac to the new V2.2 version. This version is way slower than V2.11.
  • I have Cataline V10.15.7 installed on my iMac. All my editing software is OK, except...
  • The color card in my iMac is not compatible with the AI version of PS and PhotoLab 6.
  • Interestingly, the color card does have 2GB memory but is still not OK for Workspace AI.
  • The V2.2 upgrade is the SLOWEST version of Workspace - this is so frustrating!
  • My iMac gave a security warning after the installation. Do they need this much access?
  • Market research & personal PCs are a conclusion, as I found no other reason for V2.2.
  • I am preparing a separate article to discuss image/video editing and what PC you need.


Conclusion

Workspace and the Enhanced Raw Format combination offer excellent raw conversion and photo editing. It has the perfect environment to review and edit our camera settings while maximizing the computational features of Olympus cameras. It also delivers high-quality 16-bit Tiff files. All this means nothing if AI or more market research needs 4-minute update cycles for each adjustment. My Macbook Pro with the M1 processor was also slower after the V2.2 upgrade. I am happy with my older iMac. ON1 2023 uses AI and performs perfectly OK with my older iMac.

I did a lunchtime photo shoot this week. As expected, the lighting had a little more contrast. I used ISO800 and center-weighted AE for my EM1 III. This improved my sensor's saturation for the subject areas and overexposed the background areas with up to +1EV. This is an example of managing your SNR to ISO ratio. I noticed Photoshop had more noise in the converted raw files than WS. 

I see no difference between the standard and AI noise reduction functions at lower ISOs. AI is more effective at higher ISOs. OM-Systems should prioritize Workspace because it is one of the most user-friendly and appealing differentiators by any manufacturer. OM-System enjoys a significant head start with Workspace. I hope they stop the silly "segregation" games and improve their marketing efforts on promoting the Enhanced Raw Format and Workspace...


Standard NR set to Low.



AI NR with the Low setting.

 


OMDS Workspace V2.11

Launch date:- January 2023

One of the biggest problems with the previous versions of OMWS was speed. They were so slow that I decided to keep the previous (V1.5) version of Workspace on my older Macbook Pro. I am happy to see that V2.11 is FAST. This is the best news possible for those of us using Workspace. Thank you, OM-System. I will add additional information as I get to know the upgraded version...

Copy and paste the link (below) in your browser for more information from OM-System.

file:///Library/Application%20Support/OMDigitalSolutions/OMWorkspace/Guide/index_ENU.html

Comments:

  • I tried PCRAW mode with my EM1 III, and the editing window did NOT change. It's still different from the regular editing window. Why does the OM-1 get access to the default editing window in PC-RAW mode and not the EM-1s? This is annoying and frustrating...
  • We can't save our converted raw files as 16-bit Tiff files in PCRAW mode. I have been using DxO PhotoLab while waiting for a faster OMWS V2 upgrade. I can export my PhotoLab 16-bit Tiff file to Photoshop, plus Deeprime works with my 2014 iMac...


OMDS Workspace V2.10

Launch date:- November 2022

Speed continues to be the biggest problem for this version. Why is this not a priority..?


OMDS Workspace V2.01

Launch date:- May 2022

New Products or Firmware Updates:

 - None


Updates:

- Workspace was updated to allow for OM-1 updates via WS

- The following cameras now have the backup function

- OM-1, EM1X, EM1 II/III, EM5 II (V3 and later), Pen F (V2 or later)

- OMDS recommends using WS V2.01 when updating your camera  

- It seems OMDS added some stability improvements in V2.01


Comments: (reviewed)

  • The more powerful version 2 is much slower than the V1.5 plus requires more PC power. It could be a good idea to keep the V1.5 version and only upgrade if you bought an OM-1. 
  • One of the issues with V2.0 is the button or link to your preferred editing application. This button stopped working with V2.0. This is mainly an issue with Photoshop 2022 because the actual PS App is now in a sub-dir from the Adobe folder in the Applications folder. WS V2 does not allow us to access subfolders from the Applications App folder. It is not an issue with V1.5...
    • Workaround - (I tested the option (see illustration) below)
      • It works, but it opens the basic raw file and not the edited WS file
    • Another option is to go back to the first (Photoshop) option in WS (see below)
      • It takes a longer time to open the image in PS (maybe a minute)
      • When you select the 8-bit file option, then it will open a jpeg
      • If you do not use the 8-bit option, then it defaults to the Tiff format
      • With this option, the WS adjustments are transferred to PS
    • This does not happen with the older V1.5 version.
      • I wish OMDS would see this and prioritize a fix. I reported this to Adobe.
      • Waiting a minute is no good (time). What is the alternative OMDS?
    • I experienced NONE of this with my new M1 Macbook Pro and WS (V2)


  • I removed V2 from an older Macbook Pro and my iMac and reinstalled V1.5. It worked on my Macbook. Workspace was super fast again on my older iMac. I experienced problems transferring files to Photoshop, plus some editing reset features are no longer available in WS... I reinstalled V2.01 on my iMac and created a new database. See my comments below...
  • You will lose the new AI noise reduction from V2.0 if you downgrade. I am happy with both DxO Photolab and the new Deep-Prime option. Update: - Be aware that V1.5 and V2 are using the same image database, and this causes the downgrade to be a problem. The best option is NOT to upgrade to V2 and to wait for a fix)
  • Like older versions, V2 does not accept my iMac graphics card with 2GB memory!! Why does this happen? It has to be quicker with a "non-compatible" color card than without.
  • I bought my new Macbook Pro with the M1 processor (baby model). It works like a dream with V2, it's super quick, and the AI noise reduction works... (It's a good solution for WS!!)


OMDS Workspace V2.0

Launch date:- Feb 2022

New Products or Firmware Updates:

 - The new OMDS OM-1 camera was launched


Updates:

- Workspace has been re-introduced as OMDS software 

- Sequential shooting image group display

- This feature makes it easier to find specific scenes in a series of recorded images

- A new Focus Analyzer for groups of images 

- It evaluates the focus in each group of sequential images 

- A new AI Noise reduction option for Olympus cameras 


Comments:

  • The powerful Workspace V2 seems slower than the older V1.5 version and requires much more PC power. It could be a good idea to keep V1.5 and only upgrade if you bought the new OM-1. 
  • I removed V2 from an older Macbook Pro and iMac and reinstalled V1.5. Works great and is super fast...
  • One of the issues with V2.0 is the button or link to your preferred editing application. This button stopped working with V2.0. This is mainly an issue with PS because the actual PS App is in a sub dir in the applications folder. WS V2 does not allow us to access subfolders from the Applications App folder. The older V1.5 version is not slow...
  • You will lose the new AI noise reduction with V2.0 when you downgrade. I am happy with both DxO Photolab and the new Deep-Prime options.
  • Like other versions, V2 does not accept my iMac graphics card with 2GB..!!
  • I replaced my old Macbook Pro (baby model) with the newer M1 processor (baby model) in Dec 2021. It works like a dream with V2. It's quick, and the AI noise reduction works...
  • See my previous upgrade comments, as most problem areas are the same...
  • I hope OMDS will fix these issues soon...


Olympus Workspace V1.4 & V1.5


Launch date:- June 2021

I didn't add new information on V1.4 because the changes are not noticeable, plus it is unclear who did the updates, Olympus or OMDS...

Updates: (This is an exciting update BUT poorly communicated)

The V1.5 update happened in June 2021. The only "official" info I could find was the update added new products and general improvements.

See my comments below for this upgrade:

- It seems support for the new E-P7 was added (Most other raw converters offer no support)

- The Color Adjust function will show what colors the cursor is pointing to. Great!!

- A significant upgrade to the Color Profile - See How-To tips No. 21 - here.

- Workspace is now faster and more responsive...

- You can now also show the AF point in the image - this is great!! (See my how-to page)

- It also seems the AF point in WS does not work - it always reports the center point.

- The Color and MonoChrome Profile was opened to several other cameras' raw files

- New ART filters and Options added (E-P7). These are NOT open for all cameras

- All MK III and AP Menus can be edited with the new ART filters (raw format)

Comments:
  1. Olympus didn't fix software (WS) settings or options. When I added my iMac graphics card to the WS settings, it was accepted and rejected immediately. Even while my iMac has the 2GB video card WS requested.
  2. The Display Color Management option does not work. (That said, if you edit an image, then WS uses the image's color settings. If the image is set to RGB and your PC display to RGB, you're OK...
  3. The User Manual has not been updated to V1.5 - it's still at V1.4.1
  4. ART Filters. OMDS opened the new options for cameras with the AP Menu. That means you can edit any E-P7 raw file. The E-M1 was also added to the AP list, but the other OMDs were not...

Olympus Workspace V1.3


Launch date:- 27 March 2020 (V1.3.1)

WorkSpace has been updated to V1.3.1, and includes the following:-

- Actual WorkSpace
- Olympus Updater
- WorkSpace Help File

Launch date:- 12 February 2020 (V1.3)


New Products or Firmware Updates:

 - Olympus EM1 III was launched

Updates:

 - Video sound replacement was added (Replace video sound with LS-P4 recording)
 - Print background color selection added
 - Stability improvements

Comments:

None

Olympus Workspace V1.2


Launch date:- 17th October 2019

New Products or Firmware Updates:

 - Olympus OMD EM5 III was launched
 - Olympus Pen E-PL 10 was launched

Updates:

 - Multiple Composites added
 - JPEG Picture Mode (MonoChrome and Sepia)
 - Level Adjustment (Opacity) of ART filter effect added (only some)

Comments:

The ART filter opacity slider is compatible with the EPL10 and the EM10 III. Not all the ART filters can be adjusted, only the Pop Art and Soft Focus1 filters.

Olympus Workspace V1.1


Launch date:- 19th June 2019

New Products or Firmware Updates:

 - Olympus OMD EM1X Firmware V1.1
 - Olympus OMD EM1 II Firmware V3.0

Software Updates:

 - Connecting the EM1X and the EM1 II to a PC for high-speed Raw Data Editing
 - New functions were added

- Focus stacking

- Lighten Composite

 - New and improved Noise Reduction options
 - There are software and stability improvements
 - Multiple screen views are possible with V1.1

Comments:

 - USB RAW data edit is compatible with the EM1 II (V3), EM1X (V1.1), and the EM1 III

Olympus Workspace V1.0


Launch date:- 28th January 2019

New Products or Firmware Updates:

 - The EM1X was launched.

Comments:

Olympus Workspace was released and is available for download. First impressions were positive, but it also had some initial problems, like a strange purple screen at times or it would freeze.

One of the first things one noticed is that Workspace is much quicker than the older Viewer 3. Olympus completely redesigned the editing environment and new functions like Dehaze and Clarity. Olympus Workspace also lost a few tasks that were part of Viewer 3. See the article I wrote.



Olympus Viewer 3


Viewer 3 was the previous image editing software from Olympus. Apart from being slow, Viewer 3 was a reasonably powerful editing tool. I kept my copy of Viewer 3 on my PC.

The free download from Olympus was terminated on 31st March 2019.



Oct 20, 2018

Should it be Full-Frame or APC or M43 Sensor?

Last Update: 28th December 2020

I guess one could say, the mobile phone is now the official always with me camera. Some say they do everything with their mobile phones. But mobile phones use tiny sensors! There are many articles and YouTube videos discussing this same question. Mobile phone channels say phones are better today, and photography presenters say, cameras are still the preferred option for photographers? If the size of the sensor kept you from only using your mobile phone, then why not test different sensor sizes. Considering sensor size, I had a few cameras and thought, let's study the images and see for ourselves. Should I keep my camera or simply get the next mobile phone?

So often we see how M43 photographers are pushed around on subjects like equivalence and anyhing related to sensor size. To make things worse, there is no alternative to biased info we see in camera reviews and on photography forums. With only one or two cameras, how will you ever know?

For example, what is the so-called "Full Frame" look talked about on forums? With all the hype about full-frame sensors, wouldn't it be nice to at least simulate this "Full Frame" look? I am also searching for a formal definition but could not find anything describing this full-frame look...


Olympus Pen F, handheld @ 1/15Sec, f4.0 and ISO2000 (see the slow shutter speed and higher ISO)


I had a few cameras with different sensor sizes. It didn't take much to create a semi-controlled test for these cameras. The next step was to take images and compare them.

A little Photography wisdom...


Photography is one of those things that has a negative for each positive. Interestingly manufacturers are working hard to build new features to "bridge" these negatives. For example, study the above image and the camera settings below the picture. It's basically a blue hour scene from my wife and me strolling through this coastal town. I had my Pen-F and 17mm f1.8 with me. 

Let's study the positives and negatives:-

- Positive: Increasing the ISO helped me to up the shutter speed. Great for a blue hour
- Negative: Slow shutter speeds cause camera shake and a higher ISO more image noise.
- Solution: Build-in Image Stabilization with fast lenses, ISO w ETTR, or using a tripod?

I think we can agree that it's quick to create a long list of positives and negatives for almost every situation. I am not going to do that in this article, I believe readers know the arguments and they generally have the information when buying a new camera.

Let's look at another option:

- Positive: High ISO values enables the photographer to safely work in low-light situations.
- Negative: High ISO settings result in more noise, a lower DR, and color response issues
- Solution: Select the right solution for the job. You need more light in low-light conditions

Digital photography is much more than the size of a sensor, image noise, or IBIS. I believe the informed photographer will plan and match his or her gear to support their photography. 




To illustrate, let's consider a few more examples:

Example 1

Two hobby Photographers are going on a 5-day mountain hike. They like doing birding, animal, and landscape photography. One specializes in landscape and bird photography and the other enjoys wildlife, macro, and video. The size of their equipment and carrying weight are important to them. Image quality is important because they promote and publish their work. What typical photography gear do you think these two photographers will carry with them?

Example 2

Both the wife and husband turned 50 and they planned a 6-day bus tour in celebration. Both enjoy photography, street photography, cityscapes,, and video (storytelling). They like good IQ and prefer light and portable photography gear. Both are active on social media and each has a blog or video channel. They both won prizes and both published images. When home they do photo editing, video editing, and scrapbooking. What gear will this couple have in their camera bags?

Example 3

A 40-year-old sports fanatic and hobby photographer likes to photograph live football games and he never misses an opportunity to watch Formula One. Through the years he is a well-known face at Formula One and his action shots are popular amongst motorcar enthusiasts. Camera speed, fast and accurate autofocus, and long zoom lenses are all basic must-haves for him. Because he likes to move around during the game or race, he found mobility is important to him. What will he carry in his camera bag?




Let's study a few cameras and images...


I read a few articles and technical papers as I prepared for this article. I looked at equivalence, something discussed a lot on forums. We also know that photographers and artists are people who focus on the visual aspects of their surroundings. I, therefore, thought it was a good idea to take a few simple images and compare them so readers can examine the differences for themselves.

I used the following cameras:


Unfortunately, I had no 1" sensor camera available. I purposely mixed older and newer cameras to see if age makes any difference in image quality. Interestingly, older cameras have a lower maximum high ISO value. (The LC1 has a max ISO of 400 and the Konica Minolta A2 is ISO 800)

I used these lenses with the above cameras:

- Sony FE 50mm f1.8
- Panasonic M43 Leica 25mm f1.4
- Fujinon 35mm f1.4

I created the following "Controlled Environment" to record these images.

- I used one large Video LED soft light with fixed settings and it's on a tripod.
- I used the same "dark Room" camera setting for all the images at higher ISOs, 
- Each camera was on the same tripod in a "fixed" position. (No IBIS or IS used)
- All images were taken with a focal length of +/- 50mm and a 3:2 image ratio.
- Used RAW images and used the same basic editing for each image with PS.
- I applied no noise reduction and left the raw images "as is" or OOC.
- I focussed on the maize in the front. Background = the fruit basket and 2 chairs.

Testing background Blur @ ISO 200 & lower and f2.8


The purpose was to see how these cameras isolate the subject. It also helps to see the background blur from each camera/lens combination.


 Fujifilm XT-20, 1/15, f2.8, ISO 100

Sony A2 MKII, 1/40, f2.8 ISO 200

Konica Minolta A2, 1/25, f2.8, ISO 100

 Olympus EM1 MKII, 1/13, f2.8, ISO 64

 Panasonic G9, 1/40, f2.8 ISO 200

 Panasonic LC1 (5MP), 1/30, f2.8, ISO 100

 Panasonic LX7 (10MP), 1/25, f2.8, ISO 100

 Fujifilm X20 (12MP), 1/60, f2.8, ISO 160

Depth of Field @ ISO 200 & lower and f9.0


The purpose of this test was to study the depth of field with f9.0 selected on all these cameras. One can see how landscape images will benefit from using smaller sensor cameras.

In terms of focusing, I focused on the main subject (Corn). Using the 3rd's rule, the distance from the camera to the subject is the same as the distance from the fruit platter to the subject and the same from the chair to the fruit platter. I placed the subject on the first 3rd.


 Sony A2 MKII, 1", f9.0, ISO200

 Olympus EM1 MKII, 1/3, f9.0, ISO 200

 Panasonic G9, 1", f9.0, ISO 200

 Panasonic LX7, 1/3, f8.0, ISO 200

 Fujifilm X20, 1/5, f9.0, ISO 100

Fujifilm XT-20, 1/5, f9.0, ISO 100


High ISO (3200) and an f-stop closest to f2.8


The purpose of these test images was to see the different cameras perform at high ISOs. I was looking for things like image noise, color variations, image detail, and finally how the images compare at higher ISOs. Keep in mind I used a custom white balance for Photoshop and ALL the images. I used the "WB point" just above the chairs on the background wall.

Also important is the fact that manufacturers have different levels of noise reduction for their jpegs. Canon APS-C cameras were always praised for their good high ISO noise performance. See the Canon reviews at DPReview. The fact is, most of these highly acclaimed cameras deliver clean high ISO images with no image detail. This seemed completely irrelevant to most reviewers.

What reviewers refuse to talk about is noise reduction smears image details. This "eagerness" to present clean jpeg files happens today, also with many full-frame cameras. This is why I used RAW files for these test images and not jpegs. I also used no noise reduction with these images.


 Sony A2 MKII, 1/25, f2.8, ISO 3200

 Olympus EM1 MKII, 1/25, f2.8, ISO 3200

 Panasonic G9, 1/30, f2.8, ISO 3200

 Panasonic LX7, 1/80, f2.8, ISO 3200

 Fujifilm X20, 1/80, f2.8, ISO 3200

Fujifilm XT-20, 1/50, f2.8, ISO 3200

Testing the Full Frame look @ ISO 200 and max Apertures


The purpose of this test was to see what these different solutions look like with max apertures. What does the background blur look like and what is the ability of each camera to isolate its subjects' background? Keep in mind these images were taken in a similar "controlled" environment.


 Sony A7 MKII, 1/50, f1.8, ISO 100

 Olympus EM1 MKII, 1/160, f1.4, ISO 200

Fujifilm XT-20, 1/60, f1.4, ISO 100


Does the size of the sensor change the exposure settings?


I used the Sony A7 III, the Olympus EM1 II, and the Panasonic LX7 in this example. Three sensor sizes and three different cameras. The settings used with each camera were exactly the same. I used 50mm, f4, and 1/5 seconds at ISO 200. I used a small video LED source for each test.

I edited the RAW files in Photoshop. See the histogram for each camera next to the sample image.

The purpose of this test was to see if any of these cameras receive more light than the other. I also wanted to see if I had to adjust my exposure setting for any one of these cameras...




Well, as you can see the size of the sensor did not change the amount of light reaching the sensor. In other words, it was NOT necessary to change my exposure settings for any of these cameras...

Conclusion


If you get the chance to try different cameras in a similar "controlled" environment, then you will see how the results make you view this complete sensor size or "size and capture" thing differently. To be honest I did not discover any "Full Frame" look either. What I did see was a bunch of interesting and capable cameras, each with its own appeal and benefits.

At the start of this article, I said your photography gear should match your unique photography needs. For example, I see NO reason for having a wide angle lenses if I only do macro photography. If you are really interested in something more than a mobile phone or any specific camera or lens configuration, then search for something secondhand and sell it again if you didn't like it...

Also, study some of my other articles...


Jun 30, 2018

Editing with Olympus cameras & WorkSpace - Part 5

Last Updated: 11th April 2021


EM5 II with 17mm f1.8 lens - ISO200, f7.1, 5Sec plus Tripod - Enhanced Raw converted in WS and edited in PS.


This article studies some of my images taken with Olympus OMD or PEN cameras. They are a random selection from my photo collection. My experience with the Color and Creative features from Olympus was not enough. For example, we had cloudy conditions when visiting Prague in 2015, and I decided to use the Olympus ART filters on my EM5 II. I never saw any value in these ART filters.


All the Enhanced Raw Files were Converted with Viewer 3 or WorkSpace.


WorkSpace was not available when I wrote the original article. The previous image editor from Olympus, Viewer 3, came with two separate editing menus, the JPEG photo editor and a separate RAW converter. I preferred the RAW converter because it best mirrored the camera settings. I re-edited these images from Prague in 2023 and removed the Pop Art Filter from these images. 

See this article.




EM5 II with 12-50mm EZ lens - ISO200, f6.3, 1/800, Tripod - Enhanced Raw edited with WS, + Color Creator, and Color Filters.


The above image is from our visit to Prague in December 2015. It was overcast with much rain and clouds. Prague is a lovely city and a photographer's dream. You can imagine our disappointment when we saw the poor weather. I decided to use the Olympus ART filters for Prague.

It worked well, but the Pop Art filter was too aggressive. One cannot apply ART filters and use the Color Creator simultaneously with the EM5 II. One can, however, use the curves (highlights/shadow) function to control the ART filter effect. I continued using the Pop Art filter in Prague because it looked good on the camera display, and I knew I could change the RAW file in Viewer 3.


EM5 II with 17mm f1.8 lens - ISO 100, f7.1, 25Sec plus Tripod - Enhanced Raw file converted in WS and edited in PS.


Taken with the O-MD EM-5 MKII and the 12-50mm EZ lens, Prague City


The above image was also taken in Prague. All my Prague images were re-edited in 2023. For example, I decided to remove the Pop ART from this image in Workspace. The pop ART filter can be a bit much. I prefer the look of the first image without the Pop ART filter.


Taken with the O-MD EM-5 II and the 12-50mm EZ lens, Prague City


The image below was taken with my first EM 5 in South Africa. When home I edited the RAW file in Photoshop. I used my standard post-processing routine. From the image, you can see my style is clear bright colors. I do use pastel colors in some of my images but prefer good colors and contrasts.

I use layers in PS to target specific parts of the image. As you know we cannot do this in WorkSpace. It will be great to see Olympus add layers in WorkSpace.

That said, Olympus cameras do have a type of in-camera "layers" function. The multiple exposure mode applies a layer like "Multiply" Blending Mode when combining images. This is interesting and it's worth practicing with the Multiply blending mode in Photoshop. This will help you understand and master the in-camera multiple exposures. 


Taken with the O-MD EM-5 and the 12-50mm EZ Lens, taken in South Africa

The image below was taken in Locarno, Switzerland. The adjustments I made in Viewer 3 were Soft Focus, the Star ART Filter, Noise was set to High, Exposure comp to -1, the Color Creator, Curves (see image), Contrast to -1, and Sharpness to +1. The image was handheld with IBIS.


Olympus O-MD EM-5 II with 17mm f1.8 lens, Locarno Switzerland

The image below was taken in Emmental, Switzerland. I set the RAW file WB in Viewer 3, then used the Color Profile and Curves functions (see image).


Olympus Pen-F with 12-50mm EZ lens, Emmental Switzerland

The image below is from Locarno, Switzerland. The image was handheld relying on IBIS. The adjustments were Color Creator, Curves (see image), no Art Filter, and Keystone. I set the RAW file White Balance in Viewer 3. The Color Creator was more than helpful with this image. The reason is, that nighttime images often have challenging color casts.


Olympus O-MD EM-5 II with 17mm f1.8 lens, Locarno Switzerland

The image below was taken in Emmental, Switzerland. To respect the lady's identities, I edited the image with this look. I adjusted Soft Focus, Color Creator & Curves. The Color Creator and Curves functions are great for fine-tuning the Soft Focus Art Filter.

Olympus EM-5 MKII with 12-50mm EZ lens, Emmental Switzerland

The image below was taken in Bern, Switzerland. The editing settings I used were Light Tone Art Filter, Color Profile plus Curves. The image was taken handheld with my Pen F.

Olympus Pen-F with 17mm f1.8 lens, Bern Switzerland

The image below was taken on the Island Mainau of Germany. Adjustments used, Diorama Art Filter, Color Profile, and Curves (see image). I reduced the overall saturation with the Color Profile. The reason is the Diorama Art Filter adds too much saturation. The exposure was corrected with Curves. Contrast -1 and Sharpening +1

Olympus Pen-F with 25mm f1.8 lens,  Insel Mainau Germany 

The image below was taken in Emmental, Switzerland. Adjustments were Bleach Art Filter, Color Profile, and Curves. The bleach filter is becoming one of my favorite Art filters.

Olympus Pen-F with 25mm f1.8 lens, Emmental Switzerland

The example below is a Hi-Res image taken with the Pen-F. Preparing for this article I was testing the Pen F color profiles. I had some ND filters with me because I was trying the color functions in video mode.

The Hi-Res mode is great for simulating a slow shutter speed type water effect, especially in bright conditions. When changing over to Hi-Res mode it is important to check the camera RAW selection. My camera is always in RAW JPEG mode. When switching to Hi-Res I found the camera will go back to JPEG only.

Olympus Pen-F with 7-14mm f4.0 lens,  Emmental Switzerland

The image below was created using the Monochrome Profile. I added the blue cast using the White Balance. The editing adjustments were the Monochrome Profile, Curves, Noise Filter set to High, Contrast to -1, and Sharpness to +1.

Olympus Pen-F with 12-50mm EZ lens, Emmental Switzerland

The picture below is another Hi-Res example. The High Res mode is great for product photography. In this example, I edited the RAW file in Photoshop CC. The resolution is enormous and the detail is impressive. When working with the EM-1 II it is possible to apply focus stacking in the camera. The complete image will then be in focus. Models like the EM-5 II and the previous EM-1 can also apply focus stacking in the camera.

 Olympus Pen-F with 30mm f3.5 Macro Lens

The E-PL7 is probably an all-time bargain. I bought one 2nd hand and was pleasantly surprised by its image quality and functionality. Time-lapse movies are easy with the E-PL7, set it up & walk away and when done, collect it again. To edit the Olympus E-PL7 files in WorkSpace select the jpeg files. This will enable you to use the Color Creator, Color Profile, and MonoChrome Profile.

Like with the O-MD and Pen-F, the E-PL7 has "Live Composite" and Live Time" (Bulb) modes. Live Composite is probably one of the best-kept Olympus secrets. It is absolutely worth taking the time to master these functions, they are powerful and fun to work with.

See this link for more information when taking images of fireworks and star trails.

Olympus E-PL7 with 7-14mm f4.0 lens

The image below was shot with the EM1. My goal was to get the starlight effect. I  then created the final image in Photoshop.

Olympus OMD EM1 with 17mm f1.8 ( I used f11 to get the star effect)

The image below was created with the Pen-F and the Monochrome Profile. I applied Curves to create additional contrast.

Olympus Pen-F with 25mm f1.8 lens, Insel Mainua Germany

I didn't discuss HDR photography in this series. The Olympus built-in HDR function is powerful and fun to work with.








         .

VideoPic Blog Comments

Please add any comments to this article here.