Last updated: 2nd September 202624th August 2026 - Day 1: The Olympus E-M5 III with the 12mm f2.0 M.Zuiko lens. ISO5000, f/2.8, and 1/250th. I converted the RAW+ file in Workspace.
I saw an intro opportunity for my next YouTube video while our grandchildren were playing with their toys. While the planning and taking of the images was fun, it felt like something was not right in the above scene. You are welcome to share your thoughts. I tweaked my camera and noise filter settings while converting the enhanced raw file (RAW+) in Workspace. The question is, should I photograph and film the "flying" cars with my newer OM-3? For example, which camera is the more practical photo option for this project, the OM-3 or the older E-M1 III (OM-5)? Email me if you'd like to create a similar "high-speed" application. It will be great to have more examples in this article...
As you can see, day one started with many unknowns and questions.
Tip: The camera settings below each image tell the story of creating the final shot...
OM System OM-3 with the 12-50mm f3.5-6.3 EZ M.Zuiko lens. ISO800, f/6.3, 1/8th sec. 80MP High-ress, AI noise filter at "Low" in Workspace.
The more I learn about this application, the more I realize it's not simply a quick intro for a future YT video. For example, I seldom use more than the camera's "Low" noise filter or the Workspace AI noise filter. The intro E-M5 III photo is one of only a few times I had to use the "Standard" AI noise option in Workspace. The bright areas were clean while the shadows were simply too noisy.
Four exposure variables and one fixed (constant) variable.
The challenge became higher shutter speeds, lower ISOs, and more luminance onto the sensor, which felt like an impossible task with my current home studio and available LED lighting options.
List the typical challenges one should expect from a scene like this?
26th August 2026 - Day 2:
OM System OM-3 with the 35-100mm f2.8 Lumix lens. ISO3200, f/2.8, 1/500. I used the "Low" AI noise filter option in Workspace.
It's a mistake to encourage photographers to purchase expensive Lumix or Leica lenses for Olympus or OM System cameras. I own some inexpensive used Lumix/Leica lenses, like the 25 mm f1.4, the 20 mm f1.7, the 12-35 mm f2.8, and the 35-100 mm f2.8 lenses. The risks of paring these lenses with Olympus cameras are potential incompatibilities and high-performance issues. For example, the OM-3 prevented me from selecting some of the Pro Capture options because my Lumix 12-35 mm and 35-100 mm lenses are incompatible with some of the more advanced Pro Capture options.
Should I use the Pro Capture or high-speed sequential mode?
OM System OM-3 with the 12-40mm f2.8 Pro lens - ISO3200, f2.8, 1/500.
I made several changes to improve the OM-3 layout. The challenge was to overcome the weak scene luminance ("4th" exposure variable) of the first layout. That meant a different scene and camera/lens configuration, camera angles, and the selection and placement of light sources. I am getting closer to a working setup that could perform well as an intro scene for my next YouTube video...
List 5 improvements I made to improve the above scenes.
27th August 2026 - Day 3:
Olympus EM-1 III with the 12-40mm f2.8 Pro lens. ISO2500, f/3.2, 1/1250. The RAW+ file was converted in Workspace.
My relatively new home studio, reviewed in this
article, is perfect for static scenes. High-speed action scenarios require more planning and experience. The challenge is to systematically apply the digital imaging basics explained in my blog articles. This project has proven to be an excellent case study to explain the advantages of theoretically correct and accurate information. For example, if needed, an equivalent depth of field requires ISO 10000, f/6.3, and 1/1250 on full-frame cameras. Having 2 stops less reflected light onto the full-frame sensor means lower SNRs and more noise.
The alternative to noise is increasing the average scene luminance by 2 stops. That means doubling the light at each stop, which is easy when starting from the camera's native ISO. It's more difficult when doubling the light a third or fourth time. One quickly reaches the point of considering the actual cost implications of having enthusiast or professional equipment. The challenge social media experts are facing in 2026 is more realistic photography and equipment discussions.
28th August 2026 - Day 4:
Olympus EM-1 III with the 12-40mm f2.8 Pro lens. ISO2500, f3.2, 1/1600. The RAW+ file was converted in Workspace.
It took two weeks from starting the project to having the above photo. It's one of my most exciting projects with Olympus cameras. The practical application of illumination, sensor saturation, and a high-speed action scene is exhilirating. My final strategy focused on optimizing my depth of field and having more light on the sensor. That means I applied most of the available light to the tiny area with moving cars while applying an alternative strategy in the shadow areas. I couldn't use gamma controls like "AUTO" gradation because the contrast between illuminating the moving cars and darker areas worsened the SNR deltas. The final phase in this project will start tomorrow.
Here is a list of my home studio lighting equipment:
- 2x Rotolight Neo II LED lights with stands
- 4x SmallRig Mini LED Video Lights with tripods
- One of the first (small) Aperture LED lights
- Diffusers and color filters as needed
Olympus EM-10 IV with the Leica 25mm f1.4 lens. ISO800, f5.0, 1/50. The RAW+ was converted in Workspace and edited in Affinity.
29th August 2026 - Day 5:
Post processing and preparing the intro scene with Affinity and Final Cut Pro will take a day or two. The images below were taken with the Olympus EM-10 IV and the M.Zuiko 60 mm f/2.8 Macro lens and the Leica 25 mm f/1.4 lens. I converted and edited the enhanced raw (RAW+) files in Workspace. The Olympus EM-10 IV is a great camera with excellent image quality for everyday photography.
All the high-speed sequential photos in this article were done in silent mode at 30 fps.
The above timelapse was created from 11 RAW+ files, which I converted and cropped to the 16:9 ratio in Workspace. The remaining photos in this article were converted and edited in Workspace. The final intro scene was created from a mix of preprocessed and RAW+ content. The TruePic imaging process made it possible to create color-balanced video and photo footage by preprocessing the video clips in the camera and converting the RAW+ files in Workspace. The final intro sequence is surprisingly short for the effort of preparing my home studio and recording the video and photo footage.
See my next video for the final intro and more information.
How would you present the final version?
Siegfried