Oct 17, 2024

Dramatic Skies and Exposure Techniques

Last updated:- 12th November 2024

Introduction.

Considering image quality, which is more important, the photographer or the camera? Forum experts claim most photographers agree the sensor is more critical. Another myth promoted on forums is a general need for high-resolution sensors and more Dynamic Range (DR). It's sometimes good to remind ourselves why we do photography or select a specific camera or format. This article summarizes my takeaways after visiting the M43 forum at DPReview. These takeaways describe the contrasts between real-life photography and the talking points (narratives) pushed by marketers.

Landscapes with dramatic clouds and deep foreground shadows are known for having a higher dynamic range. The light reflecting from the clouds and deeper shadows increases the ambient DR, which adds to the complexity of photographing and editing these scenes. The Olympus Bracketing and Auto HDR (High Dynamic Range) functions are two ways of capturing and managing High DR scenes.


Olympus EM10 IV and 14-42mm II R lens. ISO250, f6.7, and 1/250. Diffused light. HDR1 Raw File.


This article reviews the practical or hands-on aspects of digital photography, exposure, and image editing. You will find more information about the following in this article:

  • The Micro Four Thirds (M43) sensor format plus a short history.
  • The Technical versus Optical characteristics of the digital camera.
  • Why are social media discussions about dynamic range only sales talk?
  • More advanced exposure techniques versus the sensor does everything.
  • Why did the HDR and ETTR techniques become less popular after 2012? 
  • The image sensor's role versus the image processor and post-processing.
  • What does it mean to paint with light or consider the light conditions?
  • How do photographers balance (control) the scene's dynamic range?
  • A short video discussing Workspace, Raw conversion, and image editing.
  • Features like Stacking, Auto HDR, Bracketing, Composite, and others.

TIP: It's best to study my images on a large display...

Olympus EM10 IV with the Zuiko 17mm f1.8 lens. ISO200, f6.3, 1/160. Enhanced Raw File converted in Workspace.


All digital cameras have technical limitations, such as too little dynamic range, rolling shutter (sensor readout speed), image noise, and others. Acknowledging these limitations, the Olympus engineering team created innovative features like Auto HDR, stacking, composite, and computational features such as high-resolution mode, ND filters, SCN modes, and a new digital recording format. 


Olympus EM5 II with the Lumix 32-35mm f2.8 lens. ISO200, f7.1, 1/160. Enhanced Raw converted in Workspace.


The M43 format is a unique digital design. The goal was to optimize the image signal path from the lens to the sensor, the lens flange design, the pixel entry angle, and Shot Noise. The Olympus engineers focused on Sensor Sensitivity or more Efficient sensors. Live MOS sensors benefit from larger photon-sensitive areas and are +25% more efficient than Standard CMOS sensors.

See the short video I created about types of sensors and the new OM-1 sensor.


Olympus EM1 III with Lumix 35 - 100mm f2.8 lens. ISO200, f5.6, 1/400. This is an amazing lens.


Why did Olympus use the 4:3 ratio? The 4:3 ratio fills the sensor's image circle more efficiently than the older 3:2 ratio. This enabled Olympus to design high-efficiency Zuiko lenses with 90-degree entry angles (photons) onto the Live MOS sensor. The Olympus engineers created a new format that would continue to benefit from design and future Optical and Quantum Efficiency improvements.



Does the 4:3 ratio improve our Image Quality? Photographers do not determine the efficiency of the reflected light path to the sensor. Considering the 4:3 ratio, the IQ benefits are typically less than 1%. Manufacturers benefit from the M43 format because many such improvements make a big difference. Most FF sales arguments or "fact statements" fall into the less than 1% better IQ category.

What are the benefits of Olympus (Zuiko) M43 lenses? Study this info.

See this interesting article comparing the IQ of 15 cameras. 


Olympus EM1 III and Zuiko 12-45mm f4.0 PRO lens. ISO200, f5.6, and 1/320. The Enhanced Raw File was converted into Color and Monochrome in Workspace.


Complex digital camera components like the image processor, image sensor, IBIS, and computational functions like Auto HDR and the High Ress mode did not replace the need for knowledge, skills, advanced lighting, and camera knowledge. They also didn't replace the need for a tripod, fill-in flash, lens filters, diffusers, reflectors, remote shutter control, or any other photography skill.


Olympus EM5 II with the Lumix 12-35mm f2.8. ISO200, f7.1, 1/160.


IBIS gave us more freedom and sharper images in diverse conditions. That said, IBIS did not replace the need for a tripod in critical situations. The same is true for having more efficient sensors with less image noise at higher ISOs or more advanced camera noise plus AI noise filters. It's always the more creative option to plan or patiently wait and select the best lighting for your photos.



Advanced landscape and street photographers carefully select their locations, equipment, weather, quality of light, and sunrise/sunset times. Extraordinary images require planning and a series of short 3-minute photo sessions in perfect lighting windows. For example, the lighting could be ideal until the next cloud covers the sun. Capturing those special moments and great scenes plus post-processing can take days and hours. It's not a case of large sensors and randomly point-and-shoot photos.

This is one of my favorite photographers. See his last two videos...




Does the Olympus EM1 III produce more colors than the Fuji XT5?

Advanced photography means you know your camera, editing, and how to apply lighting. The various "tree" images illustrate this concept of painting with light. I like to select an optimum dynamic range between the highlights, mid-tones, and shadows with the right time of day, clouds (diffused light), and the sun's (incident light) position. The above EM1 III image benefited from the afternoon sun, rich color, and increased mid-tone plus shadows reflected light reaching the RGB filter and sensor.



The above trees illustrate why knowledge and experience are as critical as the camera. For example, older cameras like the Olympus EM5 and Stylus 1s capture good image quality with good light. Studio photography is another genre that illustrates how we manage ambient light. The above trees show the potential of reading a scene and prepping the photo, the camera, plus image editing.



What about the camera's dynamic range? Camera reviewers and forum "experts" push oversimplified theories like "bigger is better". For example, they will say the EM5 II in the above example has less dynamic range than the EM10 IV. Does it mean the EM5 II has too little dynamic range to capture more shadow details or did I use the worst time of day? The Photons to Electrons graph (Figure 1) shows how we control the digital camera's dynamic range with the reflected light exposing the sensor. In addition, Olympus developed several options to tweak the camera's Gamma (tonal) curve.

This means we as photographers determine the sensor's Saturation and SNR. This is huge because the benefits are way more than 1%. Always ask FF forum "experts" (promoters): How much will your FF promises improve my image quality and how do I implement (manage) these benefits?

The images in this article were done with my EM1 III, EM5 II, EM10 IV, and EP-7.



What makes Workspace and the Enhanced Raw Format different? Unlike Lightroom, PhotoLab, and Capture One, Workspace is a dedicated OM System raw converter. It lets us tweak our camera settings on a personal computer because its image processing engine is similar to Olympus or OMS cameras. Most of the camera's image settings are transferred via the Enhanced Raw Format to your Workspace Personal Computer. Workspace is both a raw converter and a jpeg editor. I use Workspace to convert my Enhanced Raw Files and Adobe Photoshop to edit my converted 16-bit Tiff files.

See this article for more about Workspace and the Enhanced Raw Format.


Olympus EM5 II with Lumix 12-35mm f2.8 lens. ISO200, f5.6, 1/1000. Enhanced Raw converted in Workspace.


Technical and Optical Characteristics.


Why Technical and Optical characteristics? Modern marketing programs and simplified commercial theories are designed to support sales. The most effective way to learn more about digital cameras is to start with the differences between Optical and Technical characteristics:

  1. Optical characteristics like FOV, DOF, and lenses are linked to the sensor image circle.
  2. Technical characteristics like DR, SNR, and Noise are linked to sensor type and design.


EM1 III and Lumix 35-100mm f2.8. ISO500, f2.8, and 1/100. The enhanced raw file was converted/edited in WS/PS.


The camera's optical characteristics are linked to the sensor's diagonal measurement. The Lens Image Circle has to cover the complete image sensor. This explains why the 25mm M43 lens is the same as a 50mm full-frame lens, why the Field of View (FOV) of M43 lenses is smaller than full-frame (FF) lenses, and why it's possible to design physically smaller M43 lenses than FF lenses.


Diagonal measurements determine lens factors.


Technical information helps photographers because it describes the design and type of sensor, camera features, and image processor. Contrary to social media FF promotions, sensor size doesn't guarantee better image quality. An experienced EM1 III photographer will get similar IQ results in the same light conditions as forum "experts" with FF cameras. For example, technical information helps us to master the technical limitations of all digital cameras. Technical details are valuable when reviewing and analyzing a new digital camera and image sensor. The technical limitations of digital cameras are standard and they benefit most from photographers with knowledge and experience.


Olympus EM5 II with 9-18mm lens. ISO200, f6.3, 40s, and +2EV (Exp Comp). A complex exposure (Illumination & Luminance). I used a tripod.


Do large sensors deliver more color? The theory behind color is basic. The camera removes the color information from the reflected light with an RGB filter covering the sensor, which means the sensor captures Black-and-White images. The Image Processor uses the RGB filter values, WB measurement, and the sensor's B&W image info to recalculate the final color information in 8, 12, or 16 bits. The quality of light and the camera's Image Processor is responsible for the final Color Rendering.


EM1 III and the Lumix 12-35mm f2.8 lens. ISO1250, f5.6, 1/60. The Enhanced Raw File was converted in Workspace.


The practical side of Optical and Technical knowledge. Social media experts rely on the size of the sensor. The value proposition of the "bigger is better" theory is little image noise, more color, higher dynamic range, and image quality. Experienced photographers manage the camera's technical and optical features (camera settings, lens, framing, plus options) to match the scene, time of day, and lighting. The benefits are technical and optical control plus more creative freedom.



Does technical information improve my photography? Technical papers and the following Photons to Electrons graph explain that the sensor's Noise Floor consists of Read Noise (Temporal and Dark) and Shot Noise. Social media experts focus only on Shot Noise because the "size and capture" theory says larger sensors capture more light with "less" noise. Wouldn't the shot noise increase with more light? (Fig. 1) A better way is to control any visible noise (noise floor) with the sensor's SNR and Saturation. The Photons to Electrons graph summarizes several key aspects of an image sensor.

See this link for a recent paper discussing image sensors.


Figure 1.

Photons to Electrons Graph. Each photographer should study Figure 1. Did you know that the typical grainy effect is caused by Temporal image noise? The sensor's noise floor (Dark and Temporal noise) is active when we turn the camera on. The sensor only produces an image signal once the reflected light exceeds the sensor's AST (Absolute Sensitivity Threshold). I added the histogram to the above graph to help photographers visualize the visible shadow noise with smaller SNR values.


EM5 II with the Lumix 12-35mm f2.8 lens. ISO200, f3.2, 1/100, -0.3EV. The Hand-Held Starlight SCN Mode.


Why is the push for more pixels a marketing action? Each pixel needs control wiring. More wiring and connection points increase the sensor's Read Noise. That is why we see more shadow noise from cameras with 30MP or higher. The optimum resolution for as many as 90% of photographers is 12 to 24MP. How often do you use the High-Resolution Mode on your Olympus camera?

This article (test) by Chris Hau and his team compares 12MP to 100MP.



The Average Scene Luminance in the exposure formula (Fig. 2) is proportional to Reflected/Incident Light, time of day, and weather conditions (quality of light). That's why Pro photographers work with light. The role of the Aperture and Shutter when Exposing the sensor is also critical. Photographers use these external and camera variables to manage the sensor's Saturation (DR) and SNR. 

A short summary of the camera's Exposure Variables are:

  • The Aperture and Shutter Speed expose the image sensor
  • The ISO setting amplifies (brightens) weaker image signals
  • Flashes and Diffusers control the Average Scene Luminance
  • The time of day and the sun change the scene's Luminance
  • Different materials and colors influence Reflected Light


Olympus EM1 III with Lumix 12-35mm f2.8 lens. ISO250, f5.6, 1/60, -1EV. Enhanced Raw File converted with Workspace.


Do we need all this knowledge? A better understanding of how the digital camera works is enough. It completely changed my photography, technique, and editing style. Knowledge is a benefit in difficult situations such as blue-hour photography, wildlife, and high-speed cases like dogs playing.


Figure 2.


The Image Signal Path is the final part of this Technical and Optical summary. The next illustration gives us a basic overview of what happens in the camera. This is a helicopter view of the image signal path inside digital cameras. The illustration was designed to assist digital photographers with enough information and know-how to master the image sensor's Saturation and SNR performance.

This flow diagram is the key to mastering Workspace and the Enhanced Raw Format.

See this video discussing more advanced exposure techniques.



How important is the Image Processor? The Olympus OMD EM1 II/III and EM1X are good examples of why more powerful and faster Image Processors are significant. These cameras have the same sensor but different Image Processors. While it's interesting to study the specifications and features of these cameras, one only experiences their improved performance levels when using them. For example, the TruePic IX transformed the Olympus EM1 III into a completely different and new camera.


Olympus EM10 IV and 12-45mm f4 Pro. ISO800, f4.0, 1/800. Enhanced Raw converted in WS.


A short history of ETTR and HDR techniques. Camera reviews and forums were popular sources of information before marketers started the "size and capture" theory in 2012. Social media transformed into "bigger is better and astroturfing spaces. ETTR and HDR were more popular when theoretical presentations of the image sensor were a priority. For example, ETTR helps us to improve the SNR and Saturation of the sensor, and HDR bracketing gives us more shadow/midrange tonal data. 

Study this link for more information on Stacking, Composite, and HDR features.

Study this link for more information about exposure and tonal data. 




What did we learn from this article?


Digital cameras, sensors, image processors, and lenses are complex pieces of equipment. It could take months to discuss all their technical and optical characteristics. The information can be overwhelming and confusing without applying basic rules. A good example is forum posters and what they present as critical information. One such basic rule would let us ignore information with a smaller than 1% impact on image quality. Social media promoters "specialize" in isolated or <1% improvements.

There are two kinds of photographers today. Those who prepare their photo sessions, become masters of light, and value experience and knowledge. Others post on large forums and expect the sensor to do everything. It's good to follow real photographers and learn why they are successful.


Olympus EM10 IV with 14-42mm f3.5 - 5.6 II lens. ISO200, f4.5, 1/180, -0.5EV.


There is more to digital photography than social media promoters pushing bigger sensors and dynamic range. We also learned it's possible to control the sensor's saturation and SNR. Finally, it's all about managing the scene's reflected light and the quality of the image signal (light) exposing the sensor. The focus should be on knowledge and experience which make larger than 1% differences.

See this article for more on improving your image quality.



Olympus EM10 IV with the Zuiko 17mm f1.8 lens. ISO200, f6.3, 1/400. Enhanced Raw File converted in Workspace.


Final thoughts.


The thought of stepping away from the "size and capture" theory can be overwhelming. Learning new information and resetting from the constant repetition of modern marketing statements can take weeks. Undisclosed or subliminal promotions are popular for their programming qualities on people. The benefits of theoretically supported information are twofold. It simplifies the breakaway process from commercial theories and teaches us what happens inside the digital camera.


EM5 II with the 12-35mm f2.8 lens. ISO200, f3.5, 1/100, -0.3EV. The hand-hold Starlight SCN Mode.


It was strange to see forum posters invest so much time creating negative reports such as Workspace can't render Olympus colors, various problems with Zuiko lenses, the M43 segment having no future, the OM-1 having problems, and older M43 cameras having sub-standard sensors versus the constant repetition of FF sales arguments. Every positive input is followed by negative "reports."


Olympus EM5 II with Lumix 12 - 35mm f2.8 lens. ISO200, f5.6, 1/1250.

It was also interesting how some discussions disappeared from the forum. In a conversation, I said it's obvious to compare the Olympus EM5 II to the Sony A7R5. Did you know that the pixel areas are identical for these two cameras? That means they have similar "well" (pixel) capacities. "Experts" like saying full-frame lenses add more light onto the sensor than M43 lenses. Most photographers will say that's obvious. (lens image circle) I suggested that M43 photographers test older OM (film) lenses to experience this Full-Frame advantage with those "tiny" EM5 II (A7RV) pixels. The EM5 II benefits from a 53% pixel area advantage over the Fuji X-T5 and the EM1 III from a 21% advantage.


Pixels capture photons, NOT the size of the sensor on which they are mounted.


How do marketers "manage" programs such as the "size and capture" or "bigger is better" commercial program? Theoretical information effectively counters the programming effects of repetition. Modern marketers are in the business of managing narratives. That's why factual arguments tend to disappear from social media, and anyone who provides accurate information is discredited.

See this FF camera promotion. (Promoters say "pixel pitch" for pixel area)




I prepared a collection of my photos from October and November 2024. They illustrate the basics of what I discussed in this article. The above video has more info about editing these images.


Olympus EM10 IV and the Zuiko14-42mm f3.5-5.6 II lens. ISO200, f6.7, 1/250, -0.5EV

Olympus EM1 III with Lumix Vario 12-35mm f2.8 lens. ISO3200, f5.6, 1/40, -0.7EV.

Olympus EM1 III with Lumix Vario 12-35mm f2.8 lens. ISO200, f5.6, 1/400.

Olympus EM1 III with Lumix Vario 12 - 35mm f2.8 lens. ISO200, f7.1, 1/200, -0.3EV.

Olympus Stylus 1s. ISO100, f3.5, 1/800.

Olympus EM10 IV with 12-45mm f4.0 Pro lens. ISO200, f5.6, 1/250, +0.3EV.

Olympus EM10 IV with Zuiko 17mm f1.8 lens. ISO200, f6.3, 1/200.

Olympus EM10 IV with Zuiko 25mm f1.8 lens. ISO250, f7.1, 1/60.

Olympus EM5 II with Lumix 12-35mm f2.8 lens. ISO200, f5.0, 1/160.

Olympus EM1 III with Lumix Vario 12-35mm f2.8 lens. ISO1000, f5.6, 1/60.

Olympus EM1 III with Zuiko 12-45mm f4.0 Pro lens. ISO200, f7.1, 1/1000, -0.3EV.

Olympus EM10 IV with Lumix PZ 45 - 175mm f4 - 5.6 lens. ISO200, f5.6, 1/800.

Olympus Stylus 1s. ISO100, f3.5, 1/800.

Olympus EM5 II with Lumix 12 - 35mm f2.8 lens. ISO200, f5.6, 1/1250.

Olympus EM1 III, Lumix Vario 35 - 100mm f2.8 lens. ISO1000, f5.6, 1/200, -0.7EV.

Olympus EM5 II with Zuiko 9-18mm f4 - 5.6 lens. ISO2500, f6.3, 1/6, and a tripod.

Olympus EM1 III with Lumix Vario 35 - 100mm f2.8 lens. ISO1600, f5.6, 1/200.

Olympus EM5 II with Lumix 35 - 100mm f2.8 lens. ISO640, f5.6, 1/250.

Olympus EM1 III with Lumix Vario 35 - 100mm f2.8 lens. ISO1000, f5.6, 1/160, -0.7EV.

Olympus EP-7 with Zuiko 17mm f2.8 lens. ISO125, f2.8, 1/4000.

Olympus EM1 III with 12-45mm f4.0 Pro lens. ISO200, f7.1, 1/400, -1EV.

Olympus EM10 IV with 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 II R Kit lens. ISO200, f6.7, 1/350, -0.5EV.

Olympus EM10 IV with Zuiko 17mm f1.8 lens. ISO200, f5.0, 1/2500.

EM5 II with Lumix 35-100mm f2.8 lens. ISO640, f5.6, 1/200. Enhanced Raw converted in WS.

VideoPic Blog Comments

Please add any comments to this article here.